Superstring
Theory
a type of theory
of particle physics that treats elementary particles as extended
one-dimensional "string-like" objects rather than as the
dimensionless points in space-time used in other theories. Superstring
theories became popular during the 1980s when Michael Green of Queen Mary
College, London, and John Schwarz of the California Institute of Technology
showed that certain types of such theories might provide a fully
self-consistent quantum theory that describes gravity as well as the weak,
strong, and electromagnetic forces. The development of such a unified quantum
theory is a major goal in theoretical particle physics, but usually the
inclusion of gravity has led to intractable problems with infinite quantities
in the calculations.
The basic
entities in superstring theory are one-dimensional massless
strings only 10-33 cm
long. (This distance is the so-called Planck length, at which quantum
effects in gravity can no longer be ignored.) The strings vibrate, and each
different mode of vibration corresponds to a different particle. The strings
can also interact in ways that correspond to the observed interactions of
particles.
String theories
of elementary particles were first introduced in the early 1970s in attempts to
describe the strong force. Although quantum chromodynamics was soon accepted as the correct theory of
the strong force, string theory was given new life with the incorporation of supersymmetry, the symmetry between fermions (particles
with half-integral values of spin) and bosons (particles with integral values
of spin). Not only did the resulting superstring theory successfully
encompass all the fundamental forces, but only a limited type of the many
possible versions seemed to be properly self-consistent, making it a leading
candidate for a fully unified theory of particles and forces.
At first sight
this particular type of superstring theory might seem to have an
insurmountable drawback in that it deals with a space-time of ten dimensions
instead of the three dimensions of space and one of time that are perceived in
the everyday world. It seems, however, that six of the ten dimensions may be
"compactified," or "curled up"--i.e.,
so small that they are unnoticeable. Other problems remain, however. The theory
is still a long way from explaining the masses of the known particles. It also
implies the existence of new particles in a form of "shadow matter,"
with which normal matter can interact only through gravity.
A
Brief Introduction to Particle Physics
Physicist Clifford V. Johnson takes readers on a brief
introductory tour of the world of particle physics. A leading theoretician in
elementary particle physics, Johnson traces the history of this field from its
beginnings to the present day. He explains why physicists are currently
intrigued with the exotic ideas of superstrings and M-theory.
A Brief
Introduction to Particle Physics
By Clifford V. Johnson
High-energy particle physicists are using particle accelerators
measuring 8 km (5 mi) across to study something billions of times too small to
see. Why? To find out what everything is made of and where it comes from. These
physicists are constructing and testing new theories about objects called
superstrings. Superstrings may explain the nature of space and time and of
everything in them, from the light you are using to read these words to black
holes so dense that they can capture light forever. Possibly the smallest
objects allowed by the laws of physics, superstrings may tell us about the
largest event of all time: the big bang, and the creation of the universe!
These are exciting ideas, still strange to most people. For the
past 100 years physicists have descended to deeper and deeper levels of
structure, into the heart of matter and energy and of existence itself. Read on
to follow their progress.
Elementary,
my dear: atoms and molecules
The world around us, full of books, computers, mountains, lakes,
and people, is made by rearranging slightly more than 100 chemical elements.
Oxygen, hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen are elements especially important to
living things; silicon is especially important to computer chips.
The smallest recognizable form in which a chemical element occurs
is the atom, and the atoms of one element are unlike the atoms of any other
element. Every atom has a small core called a nucleus around which electrons
swarm. Electrons, tiny particles with a negative electrical charge, determine
the chemical properties of an element—that is, how it interacts with other
atoms to make the things around us. Electrons also are what move through wires
to make light, heat, and video games.
In 1869, before anyone knew anything about nuclei or electrons,
Russian chemist Dmitry Mendeleyev grouped the
elements according to their physical qualities and discovered the periodic law.
He was able to predict the qualities of elements that had not yet been
discovered. By the early 1900s scientists had discovered the nucleus and
electrons.
Atoms stick together and form larger objects called molecules
because of a force called electromagnetism. The best-known form of
electromagnetism is radiation: light, radio waves, X
rays, and infrared and ultraviolet radiation.
Smaller: a
century of quantum physics
Modern physics starts with light and other forms of
electromagnetic radiation. In 1900 German physicist Max Planck proposed the
quantum theory, which says that light comes in units of energy called quanta.
As we will explain, these units of light are waves and they are also particles.
Light is simultaneously energy and matter. And so is everything else.
It was Albert Einstein who first proposed (in 1905) that Planck's
units of light can be considered particles. He named these particles photons.
In the same year, Einstein published what is known as the special theory of
relativity. According to this theory, the speed of light is actually the
fastest that anything in the universe can go, and all forms of electromagnetic
radiation are forms of light, moving at the same speed.
What differentiates radio waves, visible light, and X rays is their energy. This energy is directly related to
the wave’s length. Light waves, like ocean waves, have peaks and troughs that
repeat at regular intervals, and wavelength is the distance between each pair
of peaks (or troughs). The shorter the wavelength, the higher
the energy.
How does this relate to our story? It turns out that the process
by which electrons interact is an exchange of photons (particles of light).
Therefore we can study electrons by probing them with photons.
Tiny
particles, big tools
To really understand what things are made of, we must probe them
or move them around and thus learn how they work. In the case of electrons,
physicists probe them with photons, the particles that carry the
electromagnetic force.
While some physicists studied electrons and photons, others
pondered and probed the atomic nucleus. The nucleus of each chemical element
contains a distinctive number of positively charged protons and a number of
uncharged neutrons that can vary slightly from atom to atom. Protons and
neutrons are the source of radioactivity and of nuclear energy. In 1964
physicists suggested that protons and neutrons are made of still smaller
particles they called quarks.
Probing protons and neutrons requires particles with extremely
high energies. Particle accelerators are large machines for bringing particles
to these high energies. These machines have to be big, because they accelerate
particles by applying force many times, over long distances. Some particle
accelerators are the largest machines ever constructed. This is rather ironic
given that these are delicate scientific instruments designed to probe the
shortest distances ever investigated!
The
standard model: describing fundamental particles
The proposal and acceptance of quarks was a major step in putting
together what is called the standard model of particles and forces. This
unified theory describes all of the fundamental particles, from which
everything is made, and how they interact. There are twelve kinds of
fundamental particles: six kinds of quarks and six kinds of leptons, including
the electron.
Four forces are believed to control all the interactions of these
fundamental particles. They are the strong force, which holds the nucleus
together; the weak force, responsible for radioactivity; the electromagnetic
force, which provides electric charge and binds electrons to atomic nuclei; and
gravitation, which holds us on Earth. The standard model identifies a
force-carrying particle to correspond with three of these forces. The photon,
for example, carries the electromagnetic force. Physicists have not yet
detected a particle that carries gravitation.
Powerful mathematical techniques called gauge field theories allow
physicists to describe, calculate, and predict the interactions of these
particles and forces. Gauge theories combine quantum physics and special
relativity into consistent equations that produce extremely accurate results.
The extraordinary precision of quantum electrodynamics, for example, has filled
our world with ultrareliable lasers and transistors.
A
situation of some gravity
The mathematical rules that come together in the standard model
can explain every particle physics phenomenon that we have ever seen.
Physicists can explain forces; they can explain particles. But they cannot yet
explain why forces and particles are what they are. Basic properties, such as
the speed of light, must be taken from measurements. And physicists cannot yet
provide a satisfactory description of gravity.
The basic behavior of gravity was taught
to us by English physicist Sir Isaac Newton. After creating the basics of
quantum physics in his theory of special relativity, Albert Einstein in 1915
clarified and extended Newton’s explanation with his own description of
gravity, known as general relativity. Not even Einstein, however, could bring
the two theories of relativity into a single unified field theory. Since
everything else is governed by quantum physics on small scales, what is the
quantum theory of gravity? No one has yet proposed a satisfactory answer to
this question. Physicists have been trying to find one for a long time.
At first, this might not seem to be an important problem. Compared
to other forces, gravity is extremely weak. We are aware of its action in
everyday life because its pull corresponds to mass, and Earth has a huge amount
of mass and hence a big gravitational pull. Fundamental particles have tiny
masses and hence a miniscule gravitational pull. So couldn’t we just ignore
gravity when studying fundamental particles? The ability to ignore gravity on
this scale is why we have made so much progress in particle physics over so
many years without possessing a theory of quantum gravity.
There are several reasons, however, why we cannot ignore gravity
forever. One reason is simply that scientists want to know the whole story. A
second reason is that gravity, as Einstein taught us, is the essential physics
of space and time. If this physics is not subject to the same quantum laws that
any other physics are subject to, something is wrong somewhere. A third reason
is that an understanding of quantum gravity is necessary to deal with some
important questions in cosmology—for example, how did the universe get to be
the way it is, and why did galaxies form?
From the
smallest to the largest
Gravitation has been shown to spread in waves, and physicists
theorize the existence of a corresponding particle, the graviton. The force of
gravity, like everything else, has a natural quantum length. For gravity it is
about 10-31 m. This is about a million billion times smaller than a
proton.
We can't build an accelerator to probe that distance using today’s
technology, because the proportions of size and energy show that it would
stretch from here to the stars! But we know that the universe began with the
big bang, when all matter and force originated. Everything we know about today
follows from the period after the big bang, when the universe expanded.
Everything we know indicates that in the fractions of a second following the
big bang, the universe was extremely small and dense. At some earliest time,
the entire universe was no larger across than the quantum length of gravity. If
we are to understand the true nature of where everything comes from and how it
really fits together, we must understand quantum gravity!
These questions may seem almost metaphysical. Physicists now
suspect that research in this direction will answer many other questions about
the standard model—such as why are there are so many different fundamental
particles. Other questions are more immediately practical. Our control of
technology arises from our understanding of particles and forces. Answers to
physicists’ questions could increase computing power or help us find new
sources of energy. They will shape the 21st century as quantum physics has
shaped the 20th.
Superstring
theory: good vibrations?
Among the most promising new theories is the idea that everything
is made of fundamental “strings,” rather than of another layer of tiny
particles. The best analogy for these minute entities is a guitar or violin
string, which vibrates to produce notes of different frequencies and wavelengths.
Superstring theory proposes that if we WERE able to look closely enough at a
fundamental particle—at quantum-length distances—we would see a tiny, vibrating
loop!
In this view, all the different types of fundamental particles
that we find in the standard model are really just different vibrations of the
same string, which can split and join in ways that change its evident nature.
This is the case not only for particles of matter, such as quarks and
electrons, but also for force-carrying particles, such as photons.
This is a very clever idea, since it unifies everything we have
learned in a simple way. In its details, the theory is extremely complicated
but very promising. For example, the superstring theory very naturally
describes the graviton among its vibrations, and it also explains the quantum
properties of many types of black holes. There are also signs that the quantum
length of gravity is really the smallest physically possible distance. Below
this scale, points in space and time are no longer connected in sequence, so
distances cannot be measured or described. The very notions of space, time, and
distance seem to stop making sense!
Recent discoveries have shown that the five leading versions of
superstring theory are all contained within a powerful complex known as
M-Theory. M-Theory says that entities mathematically resembling membranes and
other extended objects may also be important. The end of the story has not yet
been written, however. Physicists are still working out the details, and it will
take many years to be confident that this approach is correct and
comprehensive. Much remains to be learned, and surprises are guaranteed. In the
quest to probe these small distances, experimentally and theoretically, our
understanding of nature is forever enriched, and we approach at least a part of
ultimate truth.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® Reference Library 2003. ©
1993-2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Standard
Model
Standard Model, in physics, theory that summarizes
scientists' current understanding of elementary particles and the fundamental
forces of nature.
In relativistic quantum field theory (QFT), matter consists of
particles called fermions, and forces are mediated by the interaction or
exchange of other particles called bosons. In the standard model, the
basic fermions come in three families, with each family made up of certain
quarks and leptons. The first family, which consists of low-mass quarks and
leptons, consists of the up and down quarks, the electron and its
neutrino, and an antiparticle corresponding to each (see Antimatter).
The quarks bind into triplets to form neutrons and protons, which bind together
to form nuclei, which bind to electrons to form atoms. The electron neutrinos
participate in the radioactive “beta” decay of neutrons into protons (see Radioactivity).
The particles that make up the other two families of fermions are not present
in ordinary matter, but can be created in powerful particle accelerators. The
second family consists of the charm and strange quarks, the muon and muon
neutrino, and an antiparticle corresponding to each. The third family
consists of the top and bottom quarks, the tau
and tau neutrino, and an antiparticle
corresponding to each.
The basic bosons are the gluons, which mediate the strong nuclear
force; the photon, which mediates electromagnetism; the weakons,
which mediate the weak nuclear force; and the graviton, which some
physicists believe mediates the gravitational force, though its existence has
not yet been experimentally confirmed. The QFT of the strong interaction is
called quantum chromodynamics; the QFT of the
electromagnetic and weak nuclear interactions is called electroweak theory.
Although the standard model is consistent with all
experiments performed so far, it has many shortcomings. It does not incorporate
gravity, the weakest force; it does not explain the spectrum of particle
masses; it has many arbitrary parameters; and it does not completely unify the
strong and electroweak interactions. Grand Unification Theories attempt to
unify the strong and electroweak interactions by assuming these interactions
are equivalent at sufficiently high energies. The ultimate goal in physics is
to formulate a Theory of Everything that would unify all
interactions—electroweak, strong, and gravitational.
Contributed By: John Lindner
Microsoft ® Encarta ® Reference Library 2003. ©
1993-2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.