Atom
I INTRODUCTION
Atom, tiny basic building block of matter. All the material on Earth is composed of various combinations of
atoms. Atoms are the smallest particles of a chemical element that still
exhibit all the chemical properties unique to that element. A row of 100
million atoms would be only about a centimeter long. See
also Chemical Element.
Understanding atoms is key to
understanding the physical world. More than 100 different elements exist in
nature, each with its own unique atomic makeup. The atoms of these elements
react with one another and combine in different ways to form a virtually
unlimited number of chemical compounds. When two or more atoms combine, they
form a molecule. For example, two atoms of the element hydrogen (abbreviated H)
combine with one atom of the element oxygen (O) to form a molecule of water (H20).
Since all matter—from its formation in the early
universe to present-day biological systems—consists of atoms, understanding
their structure and properties plays a vital role in physics, chemistry, and
medicine. In fact, knowledge of atoms is
essential to the modern scientific understanding of the complex systems that
govern the physical and biological worlds. Atoms and the compounds they form
play a part in almost all processes that occur on Earth and in space. All
organisms rely on a set of chemical compounds and chemical reactions to digest
food, transport energy, and reproduce. Stars such as the Sun rely on reactions
in atomic nuclei to produce energy. Scientists duplicate these reactions in
laboratories on Earth and study them to learn about processes that occur
throughout the universe.
Throughout history, people have sought to explain the
world in terms of its most basic parts. Ancient Greek philosophers conceived of
the idea of the atom, which they defined as the smallest possible piece of a
substance. The word atom comes from the Greek word meaning “not
divisible.” The ancient Greeks also believed this fundamental particle was
indestructible. Scientists have since learned that atoms are not indivisible
but made of smaller particles, and atoms of different elements contain
different numbers of each type of these smaller particles.
II THE STRUCTURE OF THE ATOM
Atoms are made of smaller particles, called electrons,
protons, and neutrons. An atom consists of a cloud of electrons surrounding a
small, dense nucleus of protons and neutrons. Electrons and protons have a
property called electric charge, which affects the way they interact with each
other and with other electrically charged particles. Electrons carry a negative
electric charge, while protons have a positive electric charge. The negative
charge is the opposite of the positive charge, and, like the opposite poles of
a magnet, these opposite electric charges attract one another. Conversely, like
charges (negative and negative, or positive and positive) repel one another.
The attraction between an atom’s electrons and its protons holds the atom
together. Normally, an atom is electrically neutral, which means that the
negative charge of its electrons is exactly equaled
by the positive charge of its protons.
The nucleus contains nearly all of the mass of the
atom, but it occupies only a tiny fraction of the space inside the atom. The
diameter of a typical nucleus is only about 1 × 10-14 m (4 × 10-13
in), or about 1/100,000 of the diameter of the entire atom. The electron cloud
makes up the rest of the atom’s overall size. If an atom were magnified until it
was as large as a football stadium, the nucleus would be about the size of a
grape.
A Electrons
Electrons are tiny, negatively charged particles
that form a cloud around the nucleus of an atom. Each electron carries a single
fundamental unit of negative electric charge, or –1.
The electron is one of the lightest particles
with a known mass. A droplet of water weighs about a billion, billion, billion
times more than an electron. Physicists believe that electrons are one of the
fundamental particles of physics, which means they cannot be split into
anything smaller. Physicists also believe that electrons do not have any real
size, but are instead true points in space—that is, an electron has a radius of
zero.
Electrons act differently than everyday objects because
electrons can behave as both particles and waves. Actually, all objects have
this property, but the wavelike behavior of larger
objects, such as sand, marbles, or even people, is too small to measure. In
very small particles wave behavior is measurable and
important. Electrons travel around the nucleus of an atom, but because they
behave like waves, they do not follow a specific path like a planet orbiting
the Sun does. Instead they form regions of negative electric charge around the
nucleus. These regions are called orbitals, and they
correspond to the space in which the electron is most likely to be found. As we
will discuss later, orbitals have different sizes and
shapes, depending on the energy of the electrons occupying them.
B Protons and Neutrons
Protons carry a positive charge of +1, exactly the
opposite electric charge as electrons. The number of protons in the nucleus
determines the total quantity of positive charge in the atom. In an
electrically neutral atom, the number of the protons and the number of
electrons are equal, so that the positive and negative charges balance out to
zero. The proton is very small, but it is fairly massive compared to the other
particles that make up matter. A proton’s mass is about 1,840 times the mass of
an electron.
Neutrons are about the same size as protons but
their mass is slightly greater. Without neutrons present, the repulsion among
the positively charged protons would cause the nucleus to fly apart. Consider
the element helium, which has two protons in its nucleus. If the nucleus did
not contain neutrons as well, it would be unstable because of the electrical
repulsion between the protons. (The process by which neutrons hold the nucleus
together is explained below in the Strong Force section of this article.) A
helium nucleus needs either one or two neutrons to be stable. Most atoms are
stable and exist for a long period of time, but some atoms are unstable and
spontaneously break apart and change, or decay, into other atoms.
Unlike electrons, which are fundamental particles,
protons and neutrons are made up of other, smaller particles called quarks.
Physicists know of six different quarks. Neutrons and protons are made up of up
quarks and down quarks—two of the six different kinds of quarks. The
fanciful names of quarks have nothing to do with their properties; the names
are simply labels to distinguish one quark from another.
Quarks are unique among all elementary particles in
that they have electric charges that are fractions of the fundamental charge.
All other particles have electric charges of zero or of whole multiples of the
fundamental charge. Up quarks have electric charges of +. Down quarks have
charges of -.
A proton is made up of two up quarks and a down quark, so its electric charge
is
+
- ,
for a total charge of +1. A neutron is made up of an up quark and two down
quarks, so its electric charge is
-
- ,
for a net charge of zero. Physicists believe that quarks are true fundamental
particles, so they have no internal structure and cannot be split into
something smaller.
III PROPERTIES OF ATOMS
Atoms have several properties that help distinguish
one type of atom from another and determine how atoms change under certain
conditions.
A Atomic Number
Each element has a unique number of protons in
its atoms. This number is called the atomic number (abbreviated Z). Because
atoms are normally electrically neutral, the atomic number also specifies how
many electrons an atom will have. The number of electrons, in turn, determines
many of the chemical and physical properties of the atom. The lightest atom,
hydrogen, has an atomic number equal to one, contains one proton, and (if
electrically neutral) one electron. The most massive stable atom found in
nature is bismuth (Z = 83). More massive unstable atoms also exist in nature,
but they break apart and change into other atoms over time. Scientists have
produced even more massive unstable elements in laboratories.
B Mass Number
The total number of protons and neutrons in
the nucleus of an atom is the mass number of the atom (abbreviated A). The mass
number of an atom is an approximation of the mass of the atom. The electrons
contribute very little mass to the atom, so they are not included in the mass
number. A stable helium atom can have a mass number equal to three (two protons
plus one neutron) or equal to four (two protons plus two neutrons). Bismuth,
with 83 protons, requires 126 neutrons for stability, so its mass number is 209
(83 protons plus 126 neutrons).
C Atomic Mass and Weight
Scientists usually measure the mass of an atom in terms
of a unit called the atomic mass unit (abbreviated amu).
They define an amu as exactly 1/12 the mass of an
atom of carbon with six protons and six neutrons. On this scale, the mass of a
proton is 1.00728 amu and the mass of a neutron is
1.00866 amu. The mass of an atom measured in amu is nearly equal to its mass number.
Scientists can use a device called a mass
spectrometer to measure atomic mass. A mass spectrometer removes one or more
electrons from an atom. The electrons are so light that removing them hardly
changes the mass of the atom at all. The spectrometer then sends the atom
through a magnetic field, a region of space that exerts a force on magnetic or
electrically charged particles. Because of the missing electrons, the atom has
more protons than electrons and hence a net positive charge. The magnetic field
bends the path of the positively charged atom as it moves through the field.
The amount of bending depends on the atom’s mass. Lighter atoms will be
affected more strongly than heavier atoms. By measuring how much the atom’s
path curves, a scientist can determine the atom’s mass.
The atomic mass of an atom, which depends on
the number of protons and neutrons present, also relates to the atomic weight
of an element. Weight usually refers to the force of gravity on an object, but
atomic weight is really just another way to express mass. An element’s atomic
weight is given in grams. It represents the mass of one mole (6.02 × 1023
atoms) of that element. Numerically, the atomic mass and the atomic weight of
an element are the same, but the first is expressed in grams and the second is
in atomic mass units. So, the atomic weight of hydrogen is 1 gram and the
atomic mass of hydrogen is 1 amu.
D Isotopes
Atoms of the same element that differ in mass
number are called isotopes. Since all atoms of a given element have the same
number of protons in their nucleus, isotopes must have different numbers of neutrons.
Helium, for example, has an atomic number of 2 because of the two protons in
its nucleus. But helium has two stable isotopes—one with one neutron in the
nucleus and a mass number equal to three and another with two neutrons and a
mass number equal to four.
Scientists attach the mass number to an element’s name
to differentiate between isotopes. Under this convention, helium with a mass
number of three is called helium-3, and helium with a mass number of four is
called helium-4. Helium in its natural form on Earth is a mixture of these two
isotopes. The percentage of each isotope found in nature is called the
isotope’s isotopic abundance. The isotopic abundance of helium-3 is very small,
only 0.00014 percent, while the abundance of helium-4 is 99.99986 percent. This
means that only about one of every 1 million helium atoms is helium-3, and the
rest are all helium-4. Bismuth has only one naturally occurring stable isotope,
bismuth-209. Bismuth-209’s isotopic abundance is therefore 100 percent. The element
with the largest number of stable isotopes found in nature is tin, which has
ten stable isotopes.
All elements also have unstable isotopes, which are
more susceptible to breaking down, or decaying, than are the other isotopes of
an element. When atoms decay, the number of protons in their
nucleus changes. Since the number of protons in the nucleus of an atom
determines what element that atom belongs to, this decay changes one element
into another. Different isotopes decay at different rates. One way to measure
the decay rate of an isotope is to find its half-life. An isotope’s
half-life is the time that passes until half of a sample of an isotope has
decayed.
The various isotopes of a given element have nearly
identical chemical properties and many similar physical properties. They
differ, of course, in their mass. The mass of a helium-3 atom, for example, is
3.016 amu, while the mass of a helium-4 atom is 4.003
amu.
Usually scientists do not specify the atomic weight of
an element in terms of one isotope or another. Instead, they express atomic
weight as an average of all of the naturally occurring isotopes of the element,
taking into account the isotopic abundance of each. For example, the element
copper has two naturally occurring isotopes: copper-63, with a mass of 62.930 amu and an isotopic abundance of 69.2 percent, and
copper-65, with a mass of 64.928 amu and an abundance
of 30.8 percent. The average mass of naturally occurring copper atoms is equal
to the sum of the atomic mass for each isotope multiplied by its isotopic
abundance. For copper, it would be (62.930 amu x
0.692) + (64.928 amu x 0.308) = 63.545 amu. The atomic weight of copper is therefore 63.545 g.
E Radioactivity
About 300 combinations of protons and neutrons in nuclei
are stable enough to exist in nature. Scientists can produce another 3,000
nuclei in the laboratory. These nuclei tend to be extremely unstable because
they have too many protons or neutrons to stay in one piece for long. Unstable
nuclei, whether naturally occurring or created in the laboratory, break apart
or change into stable nuclei through a variety of processes known as
radioactive decays (see Radioactivity).
Some nuclei with an excess of protons simply
eject a proton. A similar process can occur in nuclei with an excess of
neutrons. A more common process of decay is for a nucleus to simultaneously
eject a cluster of 2 protons and 2 neutrons. This cluster is actually the
nucleus of an atom of helium-4, and this decay process is called alpha decay.
Before scientists identified the ejected particle as a helium-4 nucleus, they
called it an alpha particle. Helium-4 nuclei are still sometimes called alpha
particles.
The most common way for a nucleus to get rid
of excess protons or neutrons is to convert a proton into a neutron or a
neutron into a proton. This process is known as beta decay. The total electric
charge before and after the decay must remain the same. Because protons are
electrically charged and neutrons are not, the reaction must involve other
charged particles. For example, a neutron can decay into a proton, an electron,
and another particle called an electron antineutrino. The neutron has no
charge, so the charge at the beginning of the reaction is zero. The proton has
an electric charge of +1 and the electron has an electric charge of –1. The
antineutrino is a tiny particle with no electric charge. The electric charges
of the proton and electron cancel each other, leaving a net charge of zero. The
electron is the most easily detected product of this type of beta decay, and
scientists called these products beta particles before they identified them as
electrons.
Beta decay also results when a proton changes to a
neutron. The end result of this decay must have a charge of +1 to balance the
charge of the initial proton. The proton changes into a
neutron, an anti-electron (also called a positron), and an electron neutrino.
A positron is identical to an electron, except the positron has an electric
charge of +1. The electron neutrino is a tiny, electrically neutral particle.
The difference between the antineutrino in neutron-proton beta decay and the
neutrino in proton-neutron beta decay is very subtle—so subtle that scientists
have yet to prove that a difference actually exists.
While scientists often create unstable nuclei in the
laboratory, several radioactive isotopes also occur naturally. These atoms
decay more slowly than most of the radioactive isotopes created in
laboratories. If they decayed too rapidly, they wouldn’t stay around long
enough for scientists to find them. The heavy radioactive isotopes found on
Earth formed in the interiors of stars more than 5 billion years ago. They were
part of the cloud of gas and dust that formed our solar system and, as such, are
reminders of the origin of Earth and the other planets. In addition, the decay
of radioactive material provides much of the energy that heats Earth’s core.
The most common naturally occurring radioactive
isotopes are potassium-40 (see Potassium), thorium-232 (see Thorium),
and uranium-238 (see Uranium). Atoms of these isotopes last, on average,
for billions of years before undergoing alpha or beta decay. The steady decay
of these isotopes and other, more stable atoms allows scientists to determine
the age of minerals in which these isotopes occur. Scientists begin by
estimating the amount of isotope that was present when the mineral formed, then
measure how much has decayed. Knowing the rate at which the isotope decays,
they can determine how much time has passed. This process, known as radioactive
dating (see Dating Methods), allows scientists to measure the age of
Earth. The currently accepted value for Earth’s age is about 4.5 billion years.
Scientists have also examined rocks from the Moon and other objects in the
solar system and have found that they have similar ages.
IV FORCES ACTING INSIDE ATOMS
In physics, a force is a push or pull on an
object. There are four fundamental forces, three of which—the electromagnetic
force, the strong force, and the weak force—are involved in keeping stable
atoms in one piece and determining how unstable atoms will decay. The
electromagnetic force keeps electrons attached to their atom. The strong force
holds the protons and neutrons together in the nucleus. The weak force governs
how atoms decay when they have excess protons or neutrons. The fourth
fundamental force, gravity, only becomes apparent with objects much larger than
subatomic particles.
A Electromagnetic Force
The most familiar of the forces at work inside
the atom is the electromagnetic force. This is the same force that causes
people’s hair to stick to a brush or comb when they have a buildup
of static electricity. The electromagnetic force causes opposite electric
charges to attract each other. Because of this force, the negatively charged
electrons in an atom are attracted to the positively charged protons in the
atom’s nucleus. This force of attraction binds the electrons to the atom. The
electromagnetic force becomes stronger as the distance between charges becomes
smaller. This property usually causes oppositely charged particles to come as
close to each other as possible. For many years, scientists wondered why
electrons didn’t just spiral into the nucleus of an atom, getting as close as
possible to the protons. Physicists eventually learned that particles as small
as electrons can behave like waves, and this property keeps electrons at set
distances from the atom’s nucleus. The wavelike nature of electrons is
discussed below in the Quantum Atom section of this article.
The electromagnetic force also causes like charges to
repel each other. The negatively charged electrons repel one another and tend
to move far apart from each other, but the positively charged nucleus exerts
enough electromagnetic force to keep the electrons attached to the atom.
Protons in the nucleus also repel one other, but, as described below, the
strong force overcomes the electromagnetic force in the nucleus to hold the
protons together.
B Strong Force
Protons and neutrons in the nuclei of atoms are
held together by the strong force. This force must overcome the electromagnetic
force of repulsion the protons in a nucleus exert on one another. The strong
force that occurs between protons alone, however, is not enough to hold them together.
Other particles that add to the strong force, but not to the electromagnetic
force, must be present to make a nucleus stable. The particles that provide
this additional force are neutrons. Neutrons add to the strong force of
attraction but have no electric charge and so do not increase the
electromagnetic repulsion.
B1 Range of the Strong Force
The strong force only operates at very short
range—about 2 femtometers (abbreviated fm), or 2 × 10-15
m (8 × 10-14 in). Physicists also use the word fermi
(also abbreviated fm) for this unit in honor of
Italian-born American physicist Enrico Fermi. The
short-range property of the strong force makes it very different from the
electromagnetic and gravitational forces. These latter forces become weaker as
distance increases, but they continue to affect objects millions of light-years
away from each other. Conversely, the strong force has such limited range that
not even all protons and neutrons in the same nucleus feel each other’s strong
force. Because the diameter of even a small nucleus is about 5 to 6 fm, protons
and neutrons on opposite sides of a nucleus only feel the strong force from
their nearest neighbors.
The strong force differs from electromagnetic and gravitational
forces in another important way—the way it changes with distance.
Electromagnetic and gravitational forces of attraction increase as particles
move closer to one another, no matter how close the particles get. This
increase causes particles to move as close together as possible. The strong
force, on the other hand, remains roughly constant as protons and neutrons move
closer together than about 2 fm. If the particles are forced much closer
together, the attractive nuclear force suddenly turns repulsive. This property
causes nuclei to form with the same average spacing—about 2 fm—between the
protons and neutrons, no matter how many protons and neutrons there are in the
nucleus.
The unique nature of the strong force
determines the relative number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. If a
nucleus has too many protons, the strong force cannot overcome the
electromagnetic repulsion of the protons. If the nucleus has too many neutrons,
the excess strong force tries to crowd the protons and neutrons too close
together. Most stable atomic nuclei fall between these extremes. Lighter
nuclei, such as carbon-12 and oxygen-16, are made up of 50 percent protons and
50 percent neutrons. More massive nuclei, such as bismuth-209, contain about 40
percent protons and 60 percent neutrons.
B2 Pions
Particle physicists explain the behavior
of the strong force by introducing another type of particle, called a pion. Protons and neutrons interact in the nucleus by
exchanging pions. Exchanging pions
pulls protons and neutrons together. The process is similar to two people
having a game of catch with a heavy ball, but with each person attached to the
ball by a spring. As one person throws the ball to the other, the spring pulls
the thrower toward the ball. If the players exchange the ball rapidly enough,
the ball and springs become just a blur to an observer, and it appears as if
the two throwers are simply pulled toward one another. This is what occurs in
the nuclei of atoms. The protons and neutrons in the nucleus are the people, pions act as the ball, and the strong force acts as the
springs holding everything together.
Pions in the nucleus exist
only for the briefest instant of time, no more than 1 × 10-23
seconds, but even during their short existence they can provide the attraction
that holds the nucleus together. Pions can also exist
as independent particles outside of the nucleus of an atom. Scientists have
created them by striking high-speed protons against a target. Even though the
free pions also live only for a short period of time
(about 1 × 10-8 seconds), scientists have been able study their
properties.
C Weak Force
The weak force lives up to its name—it is much
weaker than the electromagnetic and strong forces. Like the strong force, it
only acts over a short distance, about .01 fm. Unlike these other forces,
however, the weak force affects all the particles in an atom. The
electromagnetic force only affects the electrons and protons, and the strong
force only affects the protons and neutrons. When a nucleus has too many
protons to hold together or so many neutrons that the strong force squeezes too
tightly, the weak force actually changes one type of particle into another.
When an atom undergoes one type of decay, for example, the weak force causes a
neutron to change into a proton, an electron, and an electron antineutrino. The
total electric charge and the total energy of the particles remain the same
before and after the change.
V THE QUANTUM ATOM
Scientists of the early 20th century found they
could not explain the behavior of atoms using their
current knowledge of matter. They had to develop a new view of matter and
energy to accurately describe how atoms behaved. They called this theory
quantum theory, or quantum mechanics. Quantum theory describes matter as acting
both as a particle and as a wave. In the visible objects encountered in
everyday life, the wavelike nature of matter is too small to be apparent.
Wavelike nature becomes important, however, in microscopic particles such as
electrons. As we have discussed, electrons in atoms behave like waves. They
exist as a fuzzy cloud of negative charge around the nucleus, instead of as a
particle located at a single point.
A Wave Behavior
In order to understand the quantum model of the
atom, we must know some basic facts about waves. Waves are vibrations that
repeat regularly over and over again. A familiar example of waves occurs when
one end of a rope is tied to a fixed object and someone moves the other end up
and down. This action creates waves that travel along the rope. The highest
point that the rope reaches is called the crest of the wave. The lowest point
is called the trough of the wave. Troughs and crests follow each other in a
regular sequence. The distance from one trough to the next trough, or from one
crest to the next crest, is called a wavelength. The number of wavelengths that
pass a certain point in a given amount of time is called the wave’s frequency.
In physics, the word wave usually means
the entire pattern, which may consist of many individual troughs and crests.
For example, when the person holding the loose end of the rope moves it up and
down very fast, many troughs and crests occupy the rope at once. A physicist
would use the word wave to describe the entire set of troughs and crests
on the rope.
When two waves meet each other, they merge in
a process called interference. Interference creates a new wave pattern. If two
waves with the same wavelength and frequency come together, the resulting
pattern depends on the relative position of the waves’ crests. If the crests
and troughs of the two waves coincide, the waves are said to be in phase. Waves
in phase with each other will merge to produce higher crests and lower troughs.
Physicists call this type of interference constructive interference.
Sometimes waves with the same wavelength and
frequency are out of phase, meaning they meet in such a way that their
respective crests and troughs do not coincide. In these cases the waves produce
destructive interference. If two identical waves are exactly half a wavelength
out of phase, the crests of one wave line up with the troughs of the other.
These waves cancel each other out completely, and no wave will appear. If two
waves meet that are not exactly in phase and not exactly one-half wavelength
out of phase, they will interfere constructively in some places and
destructively in others, producing a complicated new wave. See also Wave
Motion.
B Electrons as Waves
Electrons behave as both particles and waves in
atoms. This characteristic is called wave-particle duality. Wave-particle
duality actually affects all particles and collections of particles, including
protons, neutrons, and atoms themselves. But in terms of the structure of the
atom, the wavelike nature of the electron is the most important.
As waves, electrons have wavelengths and
frequencies. The wavelength of an electron depends on the electron’s energy.
Since the energy of electrons is kinetic (energy related to motion), an
electron’s wavelength depends on how fast it is moving. The more energy an
electron has, the shorter its wavelength is. Electron waves can interfere with
each other, just as waves along a rope do.
Because of the electron’s wave-particle duality,
physicists cannot define an electron’s exact location in an atom. If the
electron were just a particle, measuring its location would be relatively
simple. As soon as physicists try to measure its location, however, the
electron’s wavelike nature becomes apparent, and they cannot pinpoint an exact
location. Instead, physicists calculate the probability that the electron is
located in a certain place. Adding up all these probabilities, physicists can
produce a picture of the electron that resembles a fuzzy cloud around the
nucleus. The densest part of this cloud represents the place where the electron
is most likely to be located.
C Electron Orbitals
and Shells
Physicists call the region of space an electron
occupies in an atom the electron’s orbital. Similar orbitals
constitute groups called shells. The electrons in the orbitals
of a particular shell have similar levels of energy. This energy is in the form
of both kinetic energy and potential energy. Lower shells are close to the
nucleus and higher shells are farther from the nucleus. Electrons occupying orbitals in higher shells generally have more energy than
electrons occupying orbitals in lower shells.
C1 Differences Between
Orbitals
The wavelike nature of electrons sets boundaries
for their possible locations and determines what shape their orbital, or cloud
of probability, will form. Orbitals differ from each
other in size, angular momentum, and magnetic properties. In general, angular
momentum is the energy an object contains based on how fast the object is
revolving, the object’s mass, and the object’s distance from the axis around
which it is revolving. The angular momentum of a whirling ball tied to a
string, for example, would be greater if the ball was heavier, the string was
longer, or the whirling was faster. In atoms, the angular momentum of an
electron orbital depends on the size and shape of the orbital. Orbitals with the same size and shape all have the same
angular momentum. Some orbitals, however, can differ
in shape but still have the same angular momentum. The magnetic properties of
an orbital describe how it would behave in a magnetic field. Magnetic
properties also depend on the size and shape of the orbital, as well as on the orbital’s orientation in space.
The orbitals in an atom
must occur at certain distances from the nucleus to create a stable atom. At
these distances, the orbitals allow the electron wave
to complete one or more half-wavelengths (, 1, 1, 2, 2, and so on) as it travels around the nucleus.
The electron wave can then double back on itself and constructively interfere
with itself in a way that reinforces the wave. Any other distance would cause
the electron to interfere with its own wave in an unpredictable and unstable
way, creating an unstable atom.
C2 Principal and Secondary Quantum
Numbers
Physicists call the number of half-wavelengths that
an orbital allows the orbital’s principal quantum
number (abbreviated n). In general, this number determines the size of the
orbital. Larger orbitals allow more half-wavelengths
and therefore have higher principal quantum numbers. The orbital that allows
one half-wavelength has a principal quantum number of one. Only one orbital
allows one half-wavelength. More than one orbital can allow two or more
half-wavelengths. These orbitals may have the same
principal quantum number, but they differ from each other in their angular
momentum and their magnetic properties. The orbitals
that allow one wavelength have a principal quantum number of 2 (n = 2), the orbitals that allow one and a half wavelengths have a
principal quantum number of 3 (n = 3), and so on. The set of orbitals with the same principal quantum number make up a
shell.
Physicists use a second number to describe the
angular momentum of an orbital. This number is called the orbital’s
secondary quantum number, or its angular momentum quantum number (abbreviated
l). The number of possible values an orbital can have for its angular momentum
is one less than the number of half-wavelengths it allows. This means that an
orbital with a principal quantum number of n can have n-1 possible values for
its secondary quantum number.
Physicists customarily use letters to indicate orbitals with certain secondary quantum numbers. In order
of increasing angular momentum, the orbitals with the
six lowest secondary quantum numbers are indicated by the letters s, p,
d, f, g, and h. The letter s corresponds to
the secondary quantum number 0, the letter p
corresponds to the secondary quantum number 1, and so on. In general, the
angular momentum of an orbital depends on its shape. An s-orbital, with a
secondary quantum number of 0, is spherical. A p-orbital, with a secondary
quantum number of 1, resembles two hemispheres, facing one another. The
possible combinations of principal and secondary quantum numbers for the first
five shells are listed below.
C3 Subshells
More than one orbital can allow the same number of
half-wavelengths and have the same angular momentum. Physicists call orbitals in a shell that all have the same angular momentum
a subshell. They designate a subshell
with the subshell’s principal and secondary quantum
numbers. For example, the 1s subshell is the group of
orbitals in the first shell with an angular momentum
described by the letter s. The 2p subshell is
the group of orbitals in the second shell with an
angular momentum described by the letter p.
Orbitals within a subshell differ from each other in their magnetic
properties. The magnetic properties of an orbital depend on its shape and
orientation in space. For example, a p-orbital can have three different
orientations in space: one situated up and down, one from side to side, and a
third from front to back.
C4 Magnetic Quantum Number and Spin
Physicists describe the magnetic properties of an orbital
with a third quantum number called the orbital’s
magnetic quantum number (abbreviated m). The magnetic quantum number determines
how orbitals with the same size and angular momentum
are oriented in space. An orbital’s magnetic quantum
number can only have whole number values ranging from the value of the orbital’s secondary quantum number down to the negative
value of the secondary quantum number. A p-orbital, for example, has a
secondary quantum number of 1 (l = 1), so the magnetic quantum number has three
possible values: +1, 0, and -1. This means the p-orbital has three possible
orientations in space. An s-orbital has a secondary quantum number of 0 (l =
0), so the magnetic quantum number has only one possibility: 0. This orbital is a sphere, and a sphere can only have one
orientation in space. For a d-orbital, the secondary quantum number is 2 (l =
2), so the magnetic quantum number has five possible values: -2, -1, 0, +1, and
+2. A d-orbital has four possible orientations in space, as well as a fifth
orbital that differs in shape from the other four. Together, the principal,
secondary, and magnetic quantum numbers specify a particular orbital in an
atom.
Electrons are a type of particle known as a fermion. Austrian-American physicist Wolfgang Pauli discovered that no two fermions can have the exact
same quantum numbers. This principle is called the Pauli
exclusion principle, which states that two or more
identical electrons cannot occupy the same orbital in an atom. Scientists know,
however, that each orbital can hold two electrons. Electrons have another
property, called spin, that differentiates the two
electrons in each orbital. An electron’s spin has two possible values: +
(called spin-up) or -
(called spin-down). These two possible values mean that two electrons can
occupy the same orbital, as long as their spins are different. Physicists call spin the fourth quantum number of an electron orbital
(abbreviated ms). Spin, in addition to the other three quantum
numbers, uniquely describes a particular electron’s orbital.
C5 Filling Orbitals
When electrons collect around an atom’s nucleus, they
fill up orbitals in a definite pattern. They seek the
first available orbital that takes the least amount of energy to occupy.
Generally, it takes more energy to occupy orbitals
with higher quantum numbers. It takes the same energy to occupy all the orbitals in a subshell. The
lowest energy orbital is the one closest to the nucleus. It has a principal
quantum number of 1, a secondary quantum number of 0, and a magnetic quantum
number of 0. The first two electrons—with opposite spins—occupy this orbital.
If an atom has more than two electrons,
the electrons begin filling orbitals in the next subshell with one electron each until all the orbitals in the subshell have one
electron. The electrons that are left then go back and fill each orbital in the
subshell with a second electron with opposite spin.
They follow this order because it takes less energy to add an electron to an
empty orbital than to complete a pair of electrons in an orbital. The electrons
fill all the subshells in a shell, then go on to the
next shell. As the subshells and shells increase, the
order of energy for orbitals becomes more
complicated. For example, it takes slightly less energy to occupy the s-subshell in the fourth shell than it does to occupy the d-subshell in the third shell. Electrons will therefore fill
the orbitals in the 4s subshell
before they fill the orbitals in the 3d subshell, even though the 3d subshell
is in a lower shell.
D Atomic Properties
The atom’s electron cloud, that is, the arrangement
of electrons around an atom, determines most of the atom’s physical and
chemical properties. Scientists can therefore predict how atoms will interact
with other atoms by studying their electron clouds. The electrons in the
outermost shell largely determine the chemical properties of an atom. If this
shell is full, meaning all the orbitals in the shell
have two electrons, then the atom is stable, and it won’t react readily with
other atoms. If the shell is not full, the atom will chemically react with
other atoms, exchanging or sharing electrons in order to fill its outer shell.
Atoms bond with other atoms to fill their outer shells because it requires less
energy to exist in this bonded state. Atoms always seek to exist in the lowest
energy state possible.
D1 Valence Shells
Physicists call the outer shell of an atom its
valence shell. The valence shell determines the atom’s chemical behavior, or how it reacts with other elements. The fullness
of an atom’s valence shell affects how the atom reacts with other atoms. Atoms
with valence shells that are completely full are not likely to interact with
other atoms. Six gaseous elements—helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, and
radon—have full valence shells. These six elements are often called the noble
gases because they do not normally form compounds with other elements. The
noble gases are chemically inert because their atoms are in a state of low
energy. A full valence shell, like that of atoms of noble gases, provides the
lowest and most stable energy for an atom.
Atoms that do not have a full valence shell
try to lower their energy by filling up their valence shell. They can do this
in several ways: Two atoms can share electrons to complete the valence shell of
both atoms, an atom can shed or take on electrons to create a full valence
shell, or a large number of atoms can share a common pool of electrons to
complete their valence shells.
D2 Covalent Bonds
When two atoms share a pair of electrons, they
form a covalent bond. When atoms bond covalently, they form molecules. A
molecule can be made up of two or more atoms, all joined with covalent bonds.
Each atom can share its electrons with one or more other atoms. Some molecules
contain chains of thousands of covalently bonded atoms.
Carbon is an important example of an element that
readily forms covalent bonds. Carbon has a total of six electrons. Two of the
electrons fill up the first orbital, the 1s orbital, which is the only orbital
in the first shell. The rest of the electrons partially fill carbon’s valence
shell. Two fill up the next orbital, the 2s orbital, which forms the 2s subshell. Carbon’s valence shell still has the 2p subshell, containing three p-orbitals.
The two remaining electrons each fill half of the two orbitals
in the 2p subshell. The carbon atom thus has two
half-full orbitals and one empty orbital in its
valence shell. A carbon atom fills its valence shell by sharing electrons with
other atoms, creating covalent bonds. The carbon atom can bond with other atoms
through any of the three unfilled orbitals in its
valence shell. The three available orbitals in
carbon’s valence shell enable carbon to bond with other atoms in many different
ways. This flexibility allows carbon to form a great variety of molecules,
which can have a similarly great variety of geometrical shapes. This diversity
of carbon-based molecules is responsible for the importance of carbon in
molecules that form the basis for living things (see Organic Chemistry).
D3 Ionic Bonds
Atoms can also lose or gain electrons to
complete their valence shell. An atom will tend to lose electrons if it has
just a few electrons in its valence shell. After losing the electrons, the next
lower shell, which is full, becomes its valence shell. An atom will tend to
steal electrons away from other atoms if it only needs a few more electrons to
complete the shell. Losing or gaining electrons gives an atom a net electric
charge because the number of electrons in the atom is no longer the same as the
number of protons. Atoms with net electric charge are called ions. Scientists
call atoms with a net positive electric charge cations
(pronounced CAT-eye-uhns) and atoms with a net
negative electric charge anions (pronounced AN-eye-uhns).
The oppositely charged cations
and anions are attracted to each other by electromagnetic force and form ionic
bonds. When these ions come together, they form crystals. A crystal is a solid
material made up of repeating patterns of atoms. Alternating positive and
negative ions build up into a solid lattice, or framework. Crystals are also
called ionic compounds, or salts.
The element sodium is an example of an atom that
has a single electron in its valence shell. It will easily lose this electron
and become a cation. Chlorine atoms are just one
electron away from completing their valence shell. They will tend to steal an
electron away from another atom, forming an anion. When sodium and chlorine
atoms come together, the sodium atoms readily give up their outer electron to
the chlorine atoms. The oppositely charged ions bond with each other to form
the crystal known as sodium chloride, or table salt. See also Chemical
Reaction.
D4 Metallic Bonds
Atoms can complete their valence shells in a third
way: by bonding together in such a way so that all the atoms in the substance
share each other’s outer electrons. This is the way metallic
elements bond and fill their valence shells. Metals form crystal lattice
structures similar to salts, but the outer electrons in their atoms do not
belong to any atom in particular. Instead, the outer electrons belong to all
the atoms in the crystal, and they are free to move throughout the crystal.
This property makes metals good conductors of electricity.
D5 The Periodic
Table
The organization of the periodic table reflects the
way elements fill their orbitals with electrons.
Scientists first developed this chart by grouping together elements that behave
similarly in order of increasing atomic number. Scientists eventually realized
that the chemical and physical behavior of elements
was dependant on the electron clouds of the atoms of each element. The periodic
table does not have a simple rectangular shape. Each column lists elements that
share chemical properties, properties that depend on the arrangement of
electrons in the orbitals of atoms. These elements
have the same number of electrons in their valence shells. Different numbers of
elements have similar valence shells, so the columns of the periodic table
differ in height. The noble gases are all located in the rightmost column of
the periodic table, labeled column 18 in Encarta’s
periodic table. The noble gases all have full valence shells and are extremely
stable. The column labeled 11 holds the elements
copper, silver, and gold. These elements are metals that have partially filled
valence shells and conduct electricity well.
E Electron Energy Levels
Each electron in an atom has a particular
energy. This energy depends on the electron’s speed, the presence of other
electrons, the electron’s distance from the nucleus, and the positive charge of
the nucleus. For atoms with more than one electron, calculating the energy of
each electron becomes too complicated to be practical. However, the order and
relative energies of electrons follows the order of the electron orbitals, as discussed in the Electron Orbital and Shell
section of this article. Physicists call the energy an electron has in a
particular orbital the energy state of the electron. For example, the 1s
orbital holds the two electrons with the lowest possible energies in an atom.
These electrons are in the lowest energy state of any electrons in the atom.
When an atom gains or loses energy, it does so
by adding energy to, or removing energy from, its electrons. This change in
energy causes the electrons to move from one orbital,
or allowed energy state, to another. Under ordinary conditions, all electrons
in an atom are in their lowest possible energy states, given that only two
electrons can occupy each orbital. Atoms gain energy by absorbing it from light
or from a collision with another particle, or they gain it by entering an
electric or magnetic field. When an atom absorbs energy, one or more of its
electrons moves to a higher, or more energetic, orbital. Usually atoms can only
hold energy for a very short amount of time—typically 1 × 10-12
seconds or less. When electrons drop back down to their original energy states,
they release their extra energy in the form of a photon (a packet of
radiation). Sometimes this radiation is in the form of visible light. The light
emitted by a fluorescent lamp is an example of this process.
The outer electrons in an atom are easier to move
to higher orbitals than the electrons in lower orbitals. The inner electrons require more energy to move
because they are closer to the nucleus and therefore experience a stronger
electromagnetic pull toward the nucleus than the outer electrons. When an inner
electron absorbs energy and then falls back down, the photon it emits has more
energy than the photon an outer electron would emit. The emitted energy relates
directly to the wavelength of the photon. Photons with more energy are made of
radiation with a shorter wavelength. When inner electrons drop down, they emit
high-energy radiation, in the range of an X ray. X
rays have much shorter wavelengths than visible light. When outer electrons
drop down, they emit light with longer wavelengths, in the range of visible
light.
VI STUDYING ATOMS
Physicists and chemists first learned about the
properties of atoms indirectly, by studying the way that atoms join together in
molecules or how atoms and molecules make up solids, liquids, and gases. Modern
devices such as electron microscopes, particle traps, spectroscopes, and
particle accelerators allow scientists to perform experiments on small groups
of atoms and even on individual atoms. Scientists use these experiments to
study the properties of atoms more directly.
A Electron Microscopes
One of the most direct ways to study an object
is to take its photograph. Scientists take photographs of atoms by using an
electron microscope. An electron microscope imitates a normal camera, but it
uses electrons instead of visible light to form an image. In photography, light
reflects off of an object and is recorded on film or some other kind of
detector. Taking a photograph of an atom with light is difficult because atoms
are so tiny. Light, like all waves, tends to diffract, or bend around objects
in its path (see Diffraction). In order to take a sharp photograph of
any object, the wavelength of the light that bounces off the object must be
much smaller than the size of the object. If the object is about the same size
as or smaller than the light’s wavelength, the light will bend around the
object and produce a fuzzy image.
Atoms are so small that even the shortest
wavelengths of visible light will diffract around them. Therefore, capturing
photographic images of atoms requires the use of waves that are shorter than
those of visible light. X rays are a type of electromagnetic radiation like
visible light, but they have very short wavelengths—much too short to be
visible to human eyes. X-ray wavelengths are small enough to prevent the waves
from diffracting around atoms. X rays, however, have so much energy that when
they bounce off an atom, they knock electrons away from the atom. Scientists,
therefore, cannot use X rays to take a picture of an
atom without changing the atom. They must use a different method to get an
accurate picture.
Electron microscopes provide scientists with an
alternate method. Scientists shine electrons, instead of light, on an atom. As
discussed in the Electrons as Waves section of this article, electrons have
wavelike properties, so they can behave like light waves. The simplest type of
electron microscope focuses the electrons reflected off of an object and
translates the pattern formed by the reflected electrons into a visible
display. Scientists have used this technique to create images of tiny insects
and even individual living cells, but they have not been able to use it to make
a clear image of objects smaller than about 10 nanometers
(abbreviated nm), or 1 × 10-8 m (4 × 10-7 in).
To get to the level of individual atoms,
scientists must use a more powerful type of electron microscope called a
scanning tunneling microscope (STM). An STM uses a
tiny probe, the tip of which can be as small as a single atom, to scan an
object. An STM takes advantage of another wavelike property of electrons called
tunneling. Tunneling allows
electrons emitted from the probe of the microscope to penetrate, or tunnel
into, the surface of the object being examined. The rate at which the electrons
tunnel from the probe to the surface is related to the distance between the probe
and the surface. These moving electrons generate a tiny electric current that
the STM measures. The STM constantly adjusts the height of the probe to keep
the current constant. By tracking how the height of the probe changes as the
probe moves over the surface, scientists can get a detailed map of the surface.
The map can be so detailed that individual atoms on the surface are visible.
B Particle Traps
Studying single atoms or small samples of atoms can help
scientists understand atomic structure. However, all atoms, even atoms that are
part of a solid material, are constantly in motion. This constant motion makes
them difficult to examine. To study single atoms, scientists must slow the
atoms down and confine them to one place. Scientists can slow and trap atoms
using devices called particle traps.
Slowing down atoms is actually the same as cooling
them. This is because an atom’s rate of motion is directly related to its
temperature. Atoms that are moving very quickly cause a substance to have a
high temperature. Atoms moving more slowly create a lower temperature.
Scientists therefore build traps that cool atoms down to a very low
temperature.
Several different types of particle traps exist. Some
traps are designed to slow down ions, while others are designed to slow
electrically neutral atoms. Traps for ions often use electric and magnetic
fields to influence the movement of the particle, confining it in a small space
or slowing it down. Traps for neutral atoms often use lasers,
beams of light in which the light waves are uniform and consistent.
Light has no mass, but it moves so quickly that it does have momentum. This
property allows the light to affect other particles, or “bump” into them. When laser light collides with atoms, the momentum of the light
forces the atoms to change speed and direction.
Scientists use trapped and cooled atoms for a variety of
experiments, including those that precisely measure the properties of
individual atoms and those in which scientists construct extremely accurate atomic
clocks. Atomic clocks keep track of time by counting waves of radiation emitted
by atoms in traps inside the clock. Because the traps hold the atoms at low
temperatures, the mechanisms inside the clock can exercise more control over
the atom, reducing the possibility of error. Scientists can also use isolated
atoms to measure the force of gravity in an area with extreme accuracy. These
measurements are useful in oil exploration, among other things. A deposit of
oil or other substance beneath Earth’s surface has a different density than the
material surrounding it. The strength of the pull of gravity in an area depends
on the density of material in the area, so these changes in density produce
changes in the local strength of gravity. Advances in the manipulation of atoms
have also raised the possibility of using atoms to etch electronic circuits.
This would help make the circuits smaller and thereby allow more circuits to
fit in a tinier area.
In 1995 American physicists used particle traps to
cool a sample of rubidium atoms to a temperature near absolute zero (-273°C, or
–459°F). Absolute zero is the temperature at which all motion stops. When the
scientists cooled the rubidium atoms to such a low temperature, the atoms
slowed almost to a stop. The scientists knew that the momentum of the atoms,
which is related to their speed, was close to zero. At this point, a special
rule of quantum physics, called the uncertainty principle, greatly affected the
positions of the atoms. This rule states that the momentum and position of a
particle both cannot have precise values at the same time. The scientists had a
fairly precise value for the atom’s momentum (nearly zero), so the positions of
the atoms became very imprecise. The position of each atom could be described
as a large, fuzzy cloud of probability. The atoms were very close together in
the trap, so the probability clouds of many atoms overlapped one another. It
was impossible for the scientists to tell where one atom ended and another
began. In effect, the atoms formed one huge particle. This new state of matter
is called a Bose-Einstein condensate.
C Spectroscopes
Spectroscopy is the study of the radiation, or
energy, that atoms, ions, molecules, and atomic nuclei
emit. This emitted energy is usually in the form of electromagnetic
radiation—vibrating electric and magnetic waves. Electromagnetic waves can have
a variety of wavelengths, including those of visible light. X rays, ultraviolet
radiation, and infrared radiation are also forms of electromagnetic radiation.
Scientists use spectroscopes to measure this emitted radiation.
C1 Characteristic Radiation of Atoms
Atoms emit radiation when their electrons lose
energy and drop down to lower orbitals, or energy
states, as described in the Electron Energy Levels section above. The
difference in energy between the orbitals determines
the wavelength of the emitted radiation. This radiation can be in the form of
visible light for outer electrons, or it can be radiation of shorter
wavelengths, such as X-ray radiation, for inner electrons. Because the energies
of the orbitals are strictly defined and differ from
element to element, atoms of a particular element can only emit certain
wavelengths of radiation. By studying the wavelengths of radiation emitted by a
substance, scientists can identify the element or elements comprising the
substance. For example, the outer electrons in a sodium atom emit a
characteristic yellow light when they return to lower orbitals.
This is why street lamps that use sodium vapor have a
yellowish glow (See also Sodium-Vapor Lamp).
Chemists often use a procedure called a flame
test to identify elements. In a flame test, the chemist burns a sample of the
element. The heat excites the outer electrons in the element’s atoms, making
the electrons jump to higher energy orbitals. When
the electrons drop back down to their original orbitals,
they emit light characteristic of that element. This light colors
the flame and allows the chemist to identify the element.
The inner electrons of atoms also emit radiation
that can help scientists identify elements. The energy it takes to boost an
inner electron to a higher orbital is directly related to the positive charge
of the nucleus and the pull this charge exerts on the electron. When the
electron drops back to its original level, it emits the same amount of energy
it absorbed, so the emitted energy is also related to the nucleus’s charge. The
charge on the nucleus is equal to the atom’s atomic number.
Scientists measure the energy of the emitted radiation
by measuring the radiation’s wavelength. The radiation’s energy is directly
related to its wavelength, which usually resembles that of an X ray for the
inner electrons. By measuring the wavelength of the radiation that an atom’s
inner electron emits, scientists can identify the atom by its atomic number.
Scientists used this method in the 1910s to identify the atomic number of the
elements and to place the elements in their correct order in the periodic
table. The method is still used today to identify particularly heavy elements
(those with atomic numbers greater than 100) that are produced a few atoms at a
time in large accelerators (see Transuranium
Elements).
C2 Radiation Released by Radioactivity
Atomic nuclei emit radiation when they undergo
radioactive decay, as discussed in the Radioactivity section above. Nuclei
usually emit radiation with very short wavelengths (and therefore high energy)
when they decay. Often this radiation is in the form of gamma rays, a form of
electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths even shorter than X
rays. Once again, nuclei of different elements emit radiation of characteristic
wavelengths. Scientists can identify nuclei by measuring this radiation. This
method is especially useful in neutron activation analysis, a technique scientists use for identifying the presence of tiny amounts
of elements. Scientists bombard samples that they wish to identify with
neutrons. Some of the neutrons join the nuclei, making them radioactive. When
the nuclei decay, they emit radiation that allows the scientists to identify
the substance. Environmental scientists use neutron activation analysis in
studying air and water pollution. Forensic scientists, who study evidence
related to crimes, use this technique to identify gunshot residue and traces of
poisons.
D Particle Accelerators
Particle accelerators are devices that increase the speed of
a beam of elementary particles such as protons and electrons. Scientists use
the accelerated beam to study collisions between particles. The beam can collide
with a target of stationary particles, or it can collide with another
accelerated beam of particles moving in the opposite direction. If physicists
use the nucleus of an atom as the target, the particles and radiation produced
in the collision can help them learn about the nucleus. The faster the
particles move, the higher the energy they contain. If collisions occur at very
high energy, it is possible to create particles never before detected. In
certain circumstances, energy can be converted to matter, resulting in heavier
particles after the collision.
Cyclotrons and linear accelerators are two of the most
important kinds of particle accelerators. In a cyclotron, a magnetic field
holds a beam of charged particles in a circular path. An electric field
interacts with the particles’ electric charge to give them a boost of energy
and speed each time the beam goes around. In linear accelerators, charged
particles move in a straight line. They receive many small boosts of energy
from electric fields as they move through the accelerator.
Bombarding nuclei with beams of neutrons forces the
nuclei to absorb some of the neutrons and become unstable. The unstable nuclei
then decay radioactively. The way atoms decay tells scientists about the
original structure of the atom. Scientists can also deduce the size and shape
of nuclei from the way particles scatter from nuclei when they collide. Another
use of particle accelerators is to create new and exotic isotopes, including
atoms of elements with very high atomic numbers that are not found in nature.
At higher energy levels, using particles moving at
much higher speeds, scientists can use accelerators to look inside protons and
neutrons to examine their internal structure. At these energy levels,
accelerators can produce new types of particles. Some of these particles are
similar to protons or neutrons but have larger masses and are very unstable.
Others have a structure similar to the pion, the
particle that is exchanged between the proton and neutron as part of the strong
force that binds the nucleus together. By creating new particles and studying
their properties, physicists have been able to deduce their common internal
structure and to classify them using the theory of quarks. High-energy
collisions between one particle and another often produce hundreds of
particles. Experimenters have the challenging task of identifying and measuring
all of these particles, some of which exist for only the tiniest fraction of a
second.
VII HISTORY OF ATOMIC THEORY
Beginning with Democritus, who lived during the late 5th
and early 4th centuries bc, Greek philosophers developed a theory of matter that was not
based on experimental evidence, but on their attempts to understand the
universe in philosophical terms. According to this theory, all matter was
composed of tiny, indivisible particles called atoms (from the Greek word atomos, meaning “indivisible”). If a sample of a
pure element was divided into smaller and smaller parts, eventually a point
would be reached at which no further cutting would be possible—this was the
atom of that element, the smallest possible bit of that element.
According to the ancient Greeks, atoms were all
made of the same basic material, but atoms of different elements had different
sizes and shapes. The sizes, shapes, and arrangements of a material’s atoms
determined the material’s properties. For example, the atoms of a fluid were
smooth so that they could easily slide over one another, while the atoms of a
solid were rough and jagged so that they could attach to one another. Other
than the atoms, matter was empty space. Atoms and empty space were believed to
be the ultimate reality.
Although the notion of atoms as tiny bits of
elemental matter is consistent with modern atomic theory, the researchers of
prior eras did not understand the nature of atoms or their interactions in
materials. For centuries scientists did not have the methods or technology to
test their theories about the basic structure of matter, so people accepted the
ancient Greek view.
A The Birth of the Modern Atomic Theory
The work of British chemist John Dalton at the
beginning of the 19th century revealed some of the first clues about the true
nature of atoms. Dalton studied how quantities of different elements, such as hydrogen
and oxygen, could combine to make other substances, such as water. In his book A
New System of Chemical Philosophy (1808), Dalton made two assertions about
atoms: (1) atoms of each element are all identical to one another but different
from the atoms of all other elements, and (2) atoms of different elements can
combine to form more complex substances.
Dalton’s idea that different elements had different
atoms was unlike the Greek idea of atoms. The characteristics of Dalton’s atoms
determined the chemical and physical properties of a substance, no matter what
the substance’s form. For example, carbon atoms can form both hard diamonds and
soft graphite. In the Greek theory of atoms, diamond atoms would be very
different from graphite atoms. In Dalton’s theory, diamond atoms would be very
similar to graphite atoms because both substances are composed of the same
chemical element.
While developing his theory of atoms, Dalton
observed that two elements can combine in more than one way. For example, modern
scientists know that carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2)
are both compounds of carbon and oxygen. According to Dalton’s experiments, the
quantities of an element needed to form different compounds are always
whole-number multiples of one another. For example, two times as much oxygen is
needed to form a liter of CO2 than is
needed to form a liter of CO. Dalton correctly
concluded that compounds were created when atoms of pure elements joined
together in fixed proportions to form units that scientists today call
molecules.
A1 States of Matter
Scientists in the early 19th century struggled in
another area of atomic theory. They tried to understand how atoms of a single
element could exist in solid, liquid, and gaseous forms. Scientists correctly proposed
that atoms in a solid attract each other with enough force to hold the solid
together, but they did not understand why the atoms of liquids and gases did
not attract each other as strongly. Some scientists theorized that the forces
between atoms were attractive at short distances (such as when the atoms were
packed very close together to form a solid) and repulsive at larger distances
(such as in a gas, where the atoms are on the average relatively far apart).
Scientists had difficulty solving the problem of states
of matter because they did not adequately understand the nature of heat. Today
scientists recognize that heat is a form of energy, and that different amounts
of this energy in a substance lead to different states of matter. In the 19th century,
however, people believed that heat was a material substance, called caloric, that could be transferred from one object to
another. This explanation of heat was called the caloric theory. Dalton used
the caloric theory to propose that each molecule of a gas is surrounded by
caloric, which exerts a repulsive force on other molecules. According to
Dalton’s theory, as a gas is heated, more caloric is added to the gas, which
increases the repulsive force between the molecules. More caloric would also
cause the gas to exert a greater pressure on the walls of its container, in
accordance with scientists’ experiments.
This early explanation of heat and states of matter
broke down when experiments in the middle of the 19th century showed that heat
could change into energy of motion. The laws of physics state that the amount
of energy in a system cannot increase, so scientists had to accept that heat
must be energy, not a substance. This revelation required a new theory of how
atoms in different states of matter behave.
A2 Behavior of Gases
In the early 19th century Italian chemist Amedeo Avogadro made an important advance in the
understanding of how atoms and molecules in a gas behave. Avogadro began his
work from a theory developed by Dalton. Dalton’s theory proposed that a gaseous
compound, formed by combining equal numbers of atoms of two elements, should
have the same number of molecules as the atoms in one of the original elements.
For example, ten atoms of the element hydrogen (H) combine with ten atoms of chlorine
(Cl) to form ten gaseous hydrogen chloride (HCl) molecules.
In 1811 Avogadro developed a law of physics that
seemed to contradict Dalton’s theory. Avogadro’s law states that equal volumes
of different gases contain the same number of particles (atoms or molecules) if
both gases are at the same temperature and pressure. In Dalton’s experiment,
the volume of the original vessels containing the hydrogen or chlorine gases
was the same as the volume of the vessel containing the hydrogen chloride gas. The
pressures of the original hydrogen and chlorine gases were equal, but the
pressure of the hydrochloric gas was twice as great as either of the original
gases. According to Avogadro’s law, this doubled pressure would mean that there
were twice as many hydrogen chloride gas particles than there had been chlorine
particles prior to their combination.
To reconcile the results of Dalton’s experiment
with his new rule, Avogadro was forced to conclude that the original vessels of
hydrogen or chlorine contained only half as many particles as Dalton had
thought. Dalton, however, knew the total weight of each gas in the vessels, as
well as the weight of an individual atom of each gas, so he knew the total
number of atoms of each gas that was present in the vessels. Avogadro
reconciled the fact that there were twice as many atoms as there were particles
in the vessels by proposing that gases such as hydrogen and chlorine are really
made up of molecules of hydrogen and chlorine, with two atoms in each molecule.
Today scientists write the chemical symbols for hydrogen and chlorine as H2
and Cl2, respectively, indicating that there are two atoms in each
molecule. One molecule of hydrogen and one molecule of chlorine combine to form
two molecules of hydrogen chlorine (H2 + Cl2 → 2HCl). The sample of
hydrogen chloride contains twice the number of particles as either the hydrogen
or chlorine because two molecules of hydrogen chloride form when a molecule of
hydrogen combines with a molecule of chlorine.
B Electrical Forces in Atoms
The work of Dalton and Avogadro led to a
consistent view of the quantities of different gases that could be combined to
form compounds, but scientists still did not understand the nature of the
forces that attracted the atoms to one another in compounds and molecules.
Scientists suspected that electrical forces might have something to do with
that attraction, but they found it difficult to understand how electrical
forces could allow two identical, neutral hydrogen atoms to attract one another
to form a hydrogen molecule.
In the 1830s, British physicist Michael Faraday
took the first significant step toward appreciating the importance of
electrical forces in compounds. Faraday placed two electrodes connected to
opposite terminals of a battery into a solution of water containing a dissolved
compound. As the electric current flowed through the solution, Faraday observed
that one of the elements that comprised the dissolved compound became deposited
on one electrode while the other element became deposited on the other
electrode. The electric current provided by the electrodes undid the coupling
of atoms in the compound. Faraday also observed that the quantity of each
element deposited on an electrode was directly proportional to the total
quantity of current that flowed through the solution—the stronger the current,
the more material became deposited on the electrode. This discovery made it
clear that electrical forces must be in some way responsible for the joining of
atoms in compounds.
Despite these significant discoveries, most scientists
did not immediately accept that atoms as described by Dalton, Faraday, and
Avogadro were responsible for the chemical and physical behavior
of substances. Before the end of the 19th century, many scientists believed that
all chemical and physical properties could be determined by the rules of heat,
an understanding of atoms closer to that of the Greek philosophers. The
development of the science of thermodynamics (the scientific study of
heat) and the recognition that heat was a form of energy eliminated the role of
caloric in atomic theory and made atomic theory more acceptable. The new theory
of heat, called the kinetic theory, said that the atoms or molecules of a
substance move faster, or gain kinetic energy, as heat energy is added to the
substance. Nevertheless, a small but powerful group of scientists still did not
accept the existence of atoms—they regarded atoms as convenient mathematical
devices that explained the chemistry of compounds, not as real entities.
In 1905 French chemist Jean-Baptiste
Perrin performed the final experiments that helped prove the atomic theory of
matter. Perrin observed the irregular wiggling of pollen grains suspended in a
liquid (a phenomenon called Brownian motion) and correctly explained that the
wiggling was the result of atoms of the fluid colliding with the pollen grains.
This experiment showed that the idea that materials were composed of real atoms
in thermal motion was in fact correct.
As scientists began to accept atomic theory,
researchers turned their efforts to understanding the electrical properties of
the atom. Several scientists, most notably British scientist Sir William Crookes, studied the effects of sending electric current
through a gas. The scientists placed a very small amount of gas in a sealed
glass tube. The tube had electrodes at either end. When an electric current was
applied to the gas, a stream of electrically charged particles flowed from one
of the electrodes. This electrode was called the cathode, and the particles
were called cathode rays.
At first scientists believed that the rays were
composed of charged atoms or molecules, but experiments showed that the cathode
rays could penetrate thin sheets of material, which would not be possible for a
particle as large as an atom or a molecule. British physicist Sir Joseph John
Thomson measured the velocity of the cathode rays and showed that they were
much too fast to be atoms or molecules. No known force could accelerate a
particle as heavy as an atom or a molecule to such a high speed. Thomson also
measured the ratio of the charge of a cathode ray to the mass of the cathode
ray. The value he measured was about 1,000 times larger than any previous
measurement associated with charged atoms or molecules, indicating that within
cathode rays particularly tiny masses carried relatively large amounts of
charge. Thomson studied different gases and always found the same value for the
charge-to-mass ratio. He concluded that he was observing a new type of
particle, which carried a negative electric charge but was about a thousand
times less massive than the lightest known atom. He also concluded that these
particles were constituents of all atoms. Today scientists know these particles
as electrons, and Thomson is credited with their discovery.
C Rutherford’s Nuclear Atom
Scientists realized that if all atoms contain electrons
but are electrically neutral, atoms must also contain an equal quantity of
positive charge to balance the electrons’ negative charge. Furthermore, if electrons
are indeed much less massive than even the lightest atom, then this positive
charge must account for most of the mass of the atom. Thomson proposed a model
by which this phenomenon could occur: He suggested that the atom was a sphere
of positive charge into which the negative electrons were imbedded, like
raisins in a loaf of raisin bread. In 1911 British scientist Ernest Rutherford
set out to test Thomson’s proposal by firing a beam of charged particles at
atoms.
Rutherford chose alpha particles for his beam. Alpha
particles are heavy particles with twice the positive charge of a proton. Alpha
particles are now known to be the nuclei of helium atoms, which contain two
protons and two neutrons. If Thomson’s model of the atom was correct, Rutherford
theorized that the electric charge and the mass of the atoms would be too
spread out to significantly deflect the alpha particles. Rutherford was quite
surprised to observe something very different. Most of the alpha particles did
indeed change their paths by a small angle, and occasionally an alpha particle
bounced back in the opposite direction. The alpha particles that bounced back
must have struck something at least as heavy as themselves. This led Rutherford
to propose a very different model for the atom. Instead of supposing that the
positive charge and mass were spread throughout the volume of the atom, he
theorized that it was concentrated in the center of
the atom. Rutherford called this concentrated region of electric charge the
nucleus of the atom.
In the span of 100 years, from Dalton to
Rutherford, the basic ideas of atomic structure evolved from very primitive
concepts of how atoms combined with one another to an understanding of the
constituents of atoms—a positively charged nucleus surrounded by negatively
charged electrons. The interactions between the nucleus and the electrons still
required study. It was natural for physicists to model the atom, in which tiny
electrons orbit a much more massive nucleus, after a familiar structure such as
the solar system, in which planets orbit around a much more massive Sun.
Rutherford’s model of the atom did indeed resemble a tiny solar system. The
only difference between early models of the nuclear atom and the solar system
was that atoms were held together by electromagnetic force, while gravitational
force holds together the solar system.
D The Bohr Model
Danish physicist Niels Bohr
used new knowledge about the radiation emitted from atoms to develop a model of
the atom significantly different from Rutherford’s model. Scientists of the
19th century discovered that when an electrical discharge passes through a
small quantity of a gas in a glass tube, the atoms in the gas emit light. This
radiation occurs only at certain discrete wavelengths, and different elements
and compounds emit different wavelengths. Bohr, working in Rutherford’s
laboratory, set out to understand the emission of radiation at these
wavelengths based on the nuclear model of the atom.
Using Rutherford’s model of the atom as a miniature
solar system, Bohr developed a theory by which he could predict the same
wavelengths scientists had measured radiating from atoms with a single
electron. However, when conceiving this theory, Bohr was forced to make some
startling conclusions. He concluded that because atoms emit light only at
discrete wavelengths, electrons could only orbit at certain designated radii,
and light could be emitted only when an electron jumped from one of these
designated orbits to another. Both of these conclusions were in disagreement
with classical physics, which imposed no strict rules on the size of orbits. To
make his theory work, Bohr had to propose special rules that violated the rules
of classical physics. He concluded that, on the atomic scale, certain preferred
states of motion were especially stable. In these states of motion an orbiting
electron (contrary to the laws of electromagnetism) would not radiate energy.
At the same time that Bohr and Rutherford were
developing the nuclear model of the atom, other experiments indicated similar
failures of classical physics. These experiments included the emission of
radiation from hot, glowing objects (called thermal radiation) and the release
of electrons from metal surfaces illuminated with ultraviolet light (the
photoelectric effect). Classical physics could not account for these
observations, and scientists began to realize that they needed to take a new
approach. They called this new approach quantum mechanics (see Quantum
Theory), and they developed a mathematical basis for it in the 1920s. The laws
of classical physics work perfectly well on the scale of everyday objects, but
on the tiny atomic scale, the laws of quantum mechanics apply.
E Quantum Theory of Atoms
The quantum mechanical view of atomic structure
maintains some of Rutherford and Bohr’s ideas. The nucleus is still at the center of the atom and provides the electrical attraction
that binds the electrons to the atom. Contrary to Bohr’s theory, however, the
electrons do not circulate in definite planet-like orbits. The
quantum-mechanical approach acknowledges the wavelike character of electrons
and provides the framework for viewing the electrons as fuzzy clouds of
negative charge. Electrons still have assigned states of motion, but these
states of motion do not correspond to fixed orbits. Instead, they tell us
something about the geometry of the electron cloud—its size and shape and
whether it is spherical or bunched in lobes like a figure eight. Physicists
called these states of motion orbitals. Quantum
mechanics also provides the mathematical basis for understanding how atoms that
join together in molecules share electrons. Nearly 100 years after Faraday’s
pioneering experiments, the quantum theory confirmed that it is indeed
electrical forces that are responsible for the structure of molecules.
Two of the rules of quantum theory that
are most important to explaining the atom are the idea of wave-particle duality
and the exclusion principle. French physicist Louis de Broglie
first suggested that particles could be described as waves in 1924. In the same
decade, Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger and German physicist Werner
Heisenberg expanded de Broglie’s ideas into formal,
mathematical descriptions of quantum mechanics. The exclusion principle was
developed by Austrian-born American physicist Wolfgang Pauli
in 1925. The Pauli exclusion
principle states that no two electrons in an atom can have exactly the
same characteristics.
The combination of wave-particle duality and the Pauli exclusion principle sets up
the rules for filling electron orbitals in atoms. The
way electrons fill up orbitals determines the number
of electrons that end up in the atom’s valence shell. This in turn determines
an atom’s chemical and physical properties, such as how it reacts with other
atoms and how well it conducts electricity. These rules explain why atoms with
similar numbers of electrons can have very different properties, and why
chemical properties reappear again and again in a regular pattern among the
elements.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® Reference Library 2003. ©
1993-2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.